In his last post, Paul Wells at Macleans compares Canada to Somalia. Yes, you read that right. He argues that we don't have a coherent government, and uses the listeriosis outbreak to support his theory. (I personally love the talk-show host reference.) The short version:
Capital Read, Inkless Wells - By Paul Wells - Sun, Jan 4 2009 at 4:31 PM - 49 Comments
So. Let us review the options.
- Coherent government: (a) announce an inquiry; (b) hold the inquiry.
- Alternative, conservative coherent government: (a) explain why no inquiry is necessary; (b) do not hold an inquiry.
- Incoherent government — failing-state government: (a) announce an inquiry; (b) attempt to ban public-sector strikes while appointing talk-show hosts to the Senate.
blog.macleans.ca
And this is his response to some decent criticism of his post:
That is the funniest thing I've read in Canadian political commentary in a while. Thanks, Mr. Wells.
And this is his response to some decent criticism of his post:
Actually I was trying for a kind of a Mark Steyn thing, albeit to make a point Mark would not like or agree with. But of course I take your point. To be clear: I do not actually think Canada is much like Somalia. In Somalia, for instance, you can buy private health care without going to jail. There! That’s the effect I was trying for!
That is the funniest thing I've read in Canadian political commentary in a while. Thanks, Mr. Wells.
No comments:
Post a Comment